Trump also reiterated his suggestion that Palestinians should leave the comic “in different countries” and claim that people “really love that vision. … a lot of people like my concept.”
Days later, about 70 percent of Gaza was turned into a “non-go zone” for Palestinians. Confirming that Israel is working “in accordance with the vision of the US president, which we want to realize”, Israeli Minister of Defense Israel Katz proclaimed The intention of Israel to “take” more territories, adding that “willing passage” will give Palestinians who want to leave.
So far, it is clear that the Trump’s statements about Gaza had the effect of legitimizing long-term Israeli vision of ethnic cleaning of the railway. What the US president calls the “My concept” in fact is not his general.
During the decade of Israeli occupation and colonization of gauge strips, there were more plans for monitoring or dispeling the Palestinian population in the offer to ensure full control over this part of Palestine. The power of colonial practices was also examined. For example, for drawing of Israeli immigrants and thus help to transform Gazine demographics, the comic was also promoted as “Hawaii Israel”.
Left from the Israeli War to the Arab-Israeli War from 1948. year, Gaza Strip came out of the 1949 trafficking agreement. Under the Egyptian military rule. Only a small part of what was Gaza District of Palestine until then was home to two groups of Palestinians: the local population and refugees – people who were forced with their land as it was inexhaustible.
While the rifles quiet, the gauze bar became known in the Israeli policy circles as “Land slice next to the Egyptian border that Israeli leaders would like to control, preferably without their Palestinian population.
Israeli’s first attempt to take on Gaza by Silom happened in 1956. years. But under the pressure of the US President Dwight Eisenhower, Israeli Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion had no choice, but to withdraw and stop and put the end of Israel. The spatial attempt has learned Israel an important lesson: For Remar Restore the Middle East Map and that his territorial expansion agenda did success, Israel needed American support and approval.
Arabic Israeli war from 1967. year was far more successful in this regard. Through conquest and occupation, Gaza straps brought under direct Israeli rule. It opened the door to revitalize “transfer” – forced displacement and ethnic cleansing of Palestinians. Viewed as necessary, and permitted or, in the word Ben-Gurion, “Important Human and Zionist Idea”, the transfer is recognized as an effective tool for improving the Zionist colonization of Palestine.
In the coming years, as the Palestinian historian Nur Masalha, the transfer gained different labels. They include “Exchange of the population”, “Arabic return to Arabia”, “voluntary emigration” and “rehabilitation” with different Israeli governments that take different approaches.
One approach was the Minister of Defense Moshe Dayaan’s “Open Bridges”, which allowed Palestinians in Gaza to leave other countries in search of work. The second was to open offices in the refugee camps of Gaza to organize travel and passports for Palestinians who are willing to “voluntarily migrate” the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs to the “Global Travel Agency.” Notwithstanding the approach, the Israeli’s goal of politics remains the same: create a plant in Palestinians to leave the tape.
“I want everyone to go, even if they go to the moon,” said Israeli Prime Minister Levi Eshkol. Expressing Israeli frustration, Eshkol has articulated a sense of jam with what was considered the problem of Gaza. Finally, only the Palestinian population there – especially the refugee population – especially stood on the path to full of Israeli annexes.
In response to Israeli Gaza “dilemma”, his politicians were looking for more comprehensive solutions. This has led to an almost continuous flow of plans for “rehabilitation” of Palestinians outside the railway. Starting from immediately after the 1967 war. Various potential destinations appeared. They included the West Coast, a Sinai Peninsula, Iraq, or even so much in the Canada and Australia phase.
Despite Israel’s efforts and elaboration of plans – and much on the disappointment of Israeli decision makers – initiatives reached science as the number of Palestinians leaving the strip removed. And given other considerations, including moral, legal and diplomatic, plans for the displacement of the large number of Palestinians from Gaza were left in the drawer.
But as the Israeli politicians turned to examine their choice in the procedure-October, 7, 2023, ERE, “voluntary emigration”, or forced displacement, reappeared. There was any sensitivity to international opinion and potential reactions. Instead, Trump led the way, making statements about Gaza to advocate for decades of Zionist ideology and practice into official American politics.
With his attitude of politics, the American president legitimized the long-standing Israeli vision of ethnic cleansing in the bar. In the process, its policy articulation ever moved in the random of revisionist zionism, which was viewed by the Palestinian as aliens in their land and, therefore, “portable.”
In this regard, Palestinians need to go to a safe Israel and the region, the trump leaves an international joint principle that Palestinians in Gaza Structures – have legitimate rights to self-determination in their country. As such, Trump adopts the revisionist zionist ideologue of Ze’ev Jabotinski, who is “when the Arab claim faced our Jewish demand, it is like receivables from starving” with innetrently related to the Jews in the country.
Cynic promises about the better future for people who remain without anything other than their land after the brutal wiring and probable genocide must be taken seriously. Trump legitimacy gave Israeli plans posed in the case in here and now, but his presidency could also compete.
This is because he offered us the presidential sanction of ethnic cleansing as an acceptable tool. This leaves the open door for Israel – in the close or distant future – to continue “transfer”, “rehabilitation” and “voluntary emigration” of Palestinians, either in Gaza or West Coast.
Furthermore, the US president has communicated US support for illegal land attacks and colonization several times. Suggesting Gaza (and Greenland) could become an “American territory,” he again unioed and confirmed the ideas that most of the world leader placed on a bunch of waste history.
Finally, Trump moved the American position away from the room to work on a battleway. In fact, considering their statements, the basic disrespect of Palestinians seem to be in Gaza and their collective right to self-determination.
Looking at the current American politics against the historical record, Trump’s “Middle East Riviera” seems a curious combination of zionist ethnic cleansing under “transfer” model and the colonial ideal of Israel “.
It is no wonder that Trump cheered him with Israelian leaders because he calls forcibly depopulation of gauge strips and his transformation in a completely diaper colonial territory – attachment or otherwise. After all, Trump ideas follow in the steps of Zionist leaders from Ben-Gurion to Netanyah, under which he transferred the preferred but diplomatic and legally challenging option.
With Trump exit in front, such challenges could turn into tomorrow’s possibilities. The task of other countries remains to oppose the Israeli American normalization of continuous ethnic cleansing and colonial country in Palestine.
Attitudes expressed in this article are wet authority and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeere editor.
https://www.aljazeera.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/AP5612190131-1745136930_067d50-1745137063.jpg?resize=1200%2C630&quality=80
2025-04-20 12:05:00
