The statement delivered at the end of a one-day conference, which was announced on Sunday and gave many potential participants to prepare for, burst the journey for the new Constitution for Drafting and emphasized the importance of freedom of expression and man rights.
Among the participants, Syrian President Ahmed Al-Shara, who previously called Syrian “to endure the United and arm in his hand to heal the wounds and washes after decades of dictatorship.”
Here are three key tickets from the conference:
Which one will be Syria New Constitution?
The nature of the Syria Revolution – Fully rejection of decades-long rule of the Al-Assad family and Baath Party – means a new constitution.
The nature of that Constitution will reveal a lot about the Syria’s future, especially as doubts remained among many over al-Sharea’s intentions, in the light of its ex-Qaead.
Al-Sharaa quickly moved out of his past and has avoided a great extent to the division-tissue rhetoric.
In the dialogue, delegates are divided among working groups, with each focus on another topic, including the Constitution, Freedoms, Economics and Civil Society.
Houda Atassi, a member of the Preparatory Committee for the National Dialogue who has read the statement of the conference, said the Committee called for the “Provisional Constitutional Declaration” and the “Provisional Legislative Council” to determine the future of the country.
The draft constitution should achieve “the balance between the authorities, the establishment of justice, freedom and equality and the basis for the right and institutions,” a complete statement said.
However, no other details are given, and the discussions in the workshop were confidential, leaving the question so that the Constitution would take a form that still lasts, just a few days before previously declared declared 1. Martha Deadline for a new transitional government to take power.
Sovereignty and Israel’s action
The final statement strongly rejected Israeli actions in Syria from the overthrow of Al-Assad, calling them “mud violation of the Syrian state sovereignty”.
Israel moved his forces to the clipboard between Syria and Golan height, which is the Syrian territory itself illegally busy Israel. Israel also took control of areas outside the buffer zone, including Mount Hermon, and spent repeated bombing on military sites, including the attack on Tuesday.
The national dialogue called on “immediate and unconditional withdrawal” of Israeli forces from Syria.
Dipened Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu threats that his country would not permit Syrian military forces be present in southern Syria.
The conference also opposed to the attempts of Israel to indicate sectarian tensions, stating that he was willing to protect the Syria of Minorities Comrade, many of whom they live in the south.
The Committee called for “the unity of the Syrian Arab Republic” and “sovereignty over its territory, rejecting any form of fragmentation, division or strengthening of any part of the homeland.”
The new Government of Syria was in conversations with Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), Kurdish group that controls large parts of the northeastern Syria.
SDF with the support of the United States hesitated to surrender to his arms and expressed a desire for some autonomic rule in the controlled areas, which the Syrian government refuses.
Rights and freedoms
The final statement also called for “supporting the role of women in all fields” and “rejecting all forms of discrimination based on the basis of race, religion or sect.”
He also rejected calls for ethnic or religious quotas in the Government – something Al-Sharaa and other ministers previously pointed out their opposition.
The place of women in the new government was not clear after the statements of certain ministers. For example, Aisha al-Dibs, the head of the Office for Women’s Affairs, in December, said women would play a key role, but would not “cross the priorities of their nature,” and they would know “their educational role in the family “.
Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad Al-Shaibani quickly withdrew to these statements by saying that the new authorities “believe in the active role of women within society.”
The final statement of the dialogue called for protection of freedoms, including freedom of opinion and expression. This will mark a deep difference from the previous regime, under which the Syrians regularly closed due to its speech.
Another question relating to the final statement has made transitional justice and maintain “responsible for crimes” responsible, while “rejects all forms of violence, encouragement and revenge.” Reports appeared in recent weeks of revenge attack against people associated with Assad mode in Homs and other parts of the country.
Is the national dialogue too fast compiled?
Confusion surrounded the national dialogue before he started, with many calls sent at the last minute.
The opposition politician George Sabra published on social media that he received the call on 23. February, two days before the event, to be present in Damascus. Sabra lives in exile in France and said he could not travel to Syria on time.
Critics say that the nature of the national dialogue is part of a wider sample that is worried about democratic pluralism, with little details provided to the timeline for the elections and how much free Syria will be.
There were doubts about the conversation that made critics marked the lack of representation in the preparatory committee.
But even with the sudden announcement of the Date of National Dialogue, approximately 600 Syria attended conversations, and many believe it is an important step on the way to the elections and the new Syria, without a decade of dictatorship.
https://www.aljazeera.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/2025-02-25T085534Z_1949195240_RC2J1DA5KS52_RTRMADP_3_SYRIA-POLITICS-DIALOGUE-1740517628.jpg?resize=1920%2C1440
2025-02-26 03:39:00
