Americans seeking to settle a divorce and get custody of their children can gather unforeseen judicial costs trying to challenge artificial intelligence (AI) generated Deep video, Photos and documents, according to the leading prosecutor on family legislation.
Michelle O’Nel, co -founder of a law firm based in Dallas Business fox What the courts see the “real increase” of fake evidence, which are often created with AI. The problem, she said, becomes more common, and the judges are taught in schools and conferences to remain vigilant.
One type of defective evidence-is ai-generated Revenge porn – Including fake pictures and videos of people involved in intimate actions. O’Nel notes that while Deepfakes first invaded the news when they affect celebrities, the question also affects ordinary citizens who experience breaks or divorce through the family court.
Most small businesses use artificial intelligence

Using artificial intelligence to create counterfeit images and videos can pay the costs for customers that break through the divorce. (Istock/Kirill Kudryavtsev/AFP via Getty Images/Getty Images)
O’Neill’s requirement of these types of AI-generated “explosion on stage” is backed up by statistics showing that the prevalence of video Deepfake, not including photos, has grown up 900% annually Since 2019.
“If the client brings me the evidence, I need to question my own customers more than I had about where you took it? How did you get it? Do you know where?” Said O’Nel.
The problem also predominantly affects women. The AI research company has consistently found that 90% to 95% of all Internet density that are unrelated. About 90% of that amount an unmistakable porn woman.
Despite the stunning amount, O’Nel says that the platforms in social media are slowly acting.
First Lady Melania Trump performed on the Capitolian hill in early March, for the first time after returning to the White House, participating in a roundtable with legislators and victims of porn revenge and AI-generated Deepfakes.
Currently, Congress is to punish abuse on the Internet with unsuccessful, obvious images.
AI scams grow. A new tool tries to fight them

The green frame model covers the bottom of the actor while creating a synthetic video video video called as Deepfake, in London, Britain on February 12, 2019. (Reuters TV / Reuters / Reuters Photos)
Remove it deed It is a bill submitted to the Senate by the meaning of Ted Cruz, R-Texas, and Amy Klobuchar, Ming. The bill unanimously adopted the Senate earlier in 2025, and Cruz said that he believed that he would be adopted by the House before becoming a law.
As the government pushes new laws, O’Nel says that the II is used to create fraudulent and obvious content, remains a “actual threat” for the judicial system.
“The integrity of our most judicial system depends on the integrity of the evidence that you can enter and present. If you can’t even rely on the integrity of the evidence provided by the judge, if the judge cannot count on the integrity of the evidence they receive – our judicial system may be due to the existence of artificial intelligence,” she said.
Ai, O’Nel notes, she also adversely affects the economically, who have become a prey for fraudulent judicial evidence. Now a person who challenges the foster evidence can pay the video expert to conduct an exam test and check.

According to the prosecutor of the family legislation, Michel O’Nel, artificial intelligence is deeply risk to the judicial system. (Getty Images / Getty Images)
Fraud evidence can even spread to video that indicates a child when two parties are fighting for custody. If the party does not have the financial resources to refute that the evidence of abuse will be generated, the judges must now decide whether they will take the word about the alleged victim or believe in the frames that have entered the court.
“What happens to people who have no money (to refute it)? So, we not only have a threat to the integrity of the judicial system, but also we have problems with access to justice,” O’Nel said.
The prosecutor under family legislation noted that the judges first see the cruel use of the II in the creation of counterfeit documents such as falsified bank records or drug tests.
One judge also said O’Nela that they had come across a falsified audio recording that shed the second party in the negative light. The recording quality was insufficient. The judge said the identity and the evidence was expelled.
Get the Fox Business on the go by clicking here
However, with a rapid increase in this technology, O’Nel is worried that the gap between the real and what is AI-generated will narrow.
“I think this is a problem at many levels of our society. And, you know, it is very important to attract attention,” she said.
https://a57.foxnews.com/static.foxbusiness.com/foxbusiness.com/content/uploads/2025/03/0/0/divorce-artificial-intelligence.png?ve=1&tl=1
2025-03-15 09:00:00