The Court says that the detained student pro-Palestine has shown “significant evidence” violations of its constitutional rights.
In the verdict on Friday, the William Sessions District Court found that the currently held in Louisiana – presented “significant evidence” for the return that its custody has violated its detention for its free speech and the rights of the process.
Ozturk has been arrested And that he took the visa in March. The fans say it was targeted at the OP that the co-author was, criticizing Tufts University to reject the resolution of the Student Government called the school to call from the School from the Israeli company.
For these claims that are assessed, the sessions were written, the Ozturk’s case should be heard in court.
“The Court concludes that this case will continue on this court with MS Ozturk physically present for the rest of the proceedings,” he wrote.
The judge brought to the Government by 1. Maya to transmit Ozturk and determine the hearing for the bond for her to argue for temporary release.
Ozturk sent to Louisiana custody, in which critics say that the part of government efforts keep detainees away from their supporters and lawyers – and put them in conservative legal neighborhoods.
Student student Tufts was arrested near his home in Massachusetts.
Critics described an incident as abduction.
Her student visa was revoked as part of a massive point The Management Board of President Donald Trump in foreign students who protested or criticized Israel’s war on Gaza.
The sessions confirmed that the only identification evidence was whether the US government used for detention and Deportur Ozturk is OP-ED.
“Her evidence supports her argument that the government’s motivation or purpose of her detention for co-authorship in the newspaper campus criticized on the University of Tufts and to cool the political speech of others” “” “” “political
“The government has so far did not offer any evidence to support an alternative, legal motivation or purpose for Ms. Ozturk custody.”
He stressed and that it is First amendmentWhich protects free speech “, long extended” non-citizens living in the United States.
Case sessions The supervision is known as Habeas Corpus Petition. Ozturk’s detention is caused, not spreading pressure to deport it.
The deportation target is inspected through a separate system, where non-citizens make their cases in front of the Immigration Judge working in the executive. Not a special part of the government, as an independent judiciary.
Proponents say immigration Judges often “Rubber seal” decisions of the executive authorities under which they work. The immigration judge in Louisiani denied Ozturk’s release on bail before this week.
Immigration cases may be appealed to the Committee for Immigration Complaints, Administrative Body. As a final asset, immigrants may pray to make their case in front of the appellate courts that is part of the regular judicial system.
Trump Administration emphasizes that the law gave Leeway regarding immigration issues – and that in turn offers widespread presidency authorities that replace concerns about free speech and penetrating process.
To approve deportation, State Secretary Marco Rubio It has been referred to rarely the use of immigration laws and citizenship that gives it to the removal of non-citizens that it considers that “have serious unfavorable foreign policy consequences” for the United States.
But part of the verdict Friday could carry out implications for Ozturk and other students facing deportation.
The sessions have rejected the term that detainable immigrants may have their constitutional rights overlooked due to the administrative process.
The judge said that the government claims that the immigration law “assigns practically unlimited, unauthorized power to detain individuals for weeks or months, even if custody is obviously unconstitutional”.
https://www.aljazeera.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/AP25085809321843-1743053938.jpg?resize=1920%2C1440
2025-04-19 00:46:00
