A lawyer representing the government whistleblower in the case that led to the president Donald Trump’s First Impeachment sued Trump’s Administration on Monday for “Unaccommon Retal” after the security clearance was abolished.
Lawyer Tag Zaid claimed that the decision of the administration was to draw its reason in March to represent the former Department for Homeland Security Intelligence Services Brian Murphy, which was key to Trump 2019. Years.
Murphy filed whistleblower appeal in 2019. In 2019, in 2019, he mitigated the trump card, in the middle of his election campaign, pressing Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to investigate Joe Biden’s presidential candidate in Ukraine.
The American House of Representatives voted later that year to insert Trump for the abuse of his office and obstructs Congress, but later he released him the Senate.
Hakeem Jeffiles Blimens Trump for Newark Chaos Airport, accuses the white house ‘Breaking FAA’
Zaids the lawsuit, filed in the Federal Court in Washington, DC, It requires that the decision to abolish its security approval is a “dangerous, unaccompass of the President of the United States against its perceived political enemies” that “Eschews vague affectional processes”.
The complaint accuses Trump’s administration of violations of the Law on Administrative Procedures, the first amendment and parts of the fifth amendment.
“No American should lose their means to live or be blocked as a lawyer from the advocacy of clients, because the president carries a trunk towards them or who represented,” he said in the statement. “This is not just about me. It is about the use of security festive as political weapons.”
MR. MARK ZAID claimed that the decision of the administration was to take away its approval in March in the retaliation for the former Department for Homeland Security Intelligence Services Brian Murphy. (Andrew Kharnik / Getty Images)
Former VP Pence Pence for excuses If President Trump Veeers from the ‘Conservative Agenda’
The lawsuit cites the Incident in 2019. in which Trump called Zaid “Sleezeball” in the rally Louisiana and told reporters that the lawyer “Shame” which “should be sued”.
The shift to withdraw the zess was “an attack facing the world’s constitutional guarantee: the right to submit a court of clients”, notice that “attacking this right to continue and represents the rights of others without fear of retaliation.”
Trump also revoked the priests of more others Political enemiesIncluding the former Joe Bidina, former Deputy Prime Minister Harris, former Secretary Hillary Clinton and his own former National Security Adviser John Bolton, as well as lawyers in other firms.
The lawsuit accuses Trump administration for violating the Law on Administrative Procedures, First Amendments and Parts of the Fifth Amendment. (Pool through AP)
Click here to get Fox News app
Zaid invited the court To rule that Trump’s decision on recall was unconstitutional and returning his approval. He had access to classified information since 1995. and security clearance since 2002. years.
Fox News Digital reached in the White House for Comment.
Reuters contributed to this report.
https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2025/04/trump-oval-office.jpg
2025-05-06 07:00:00
