Corporate America is afraid of Trump’s wrath when he is thinking of response tariffs

US companies are struggling to find out how to respond to Donald Trump’s trade war, concerned about the impact of the president’s tariffs on the economy, but cautiously speaking with the fear of retailing the White House, the leaders and the board members.

Corporate leaders are not sure how far go in rethinking your business in response to Wednesday tariffsAgainst the backdrop of doubts about how long Trump adheres to his current course and hopes they can lobby for some politicians.

Difficult questions – this is the climate of fear created by a recent white home Targeting law firms, including Paul Weiss.

“You do not want to be a dog for barking for everyone else because you will be shot,” said one person headed by the US Council.

Another executive director of the Corporate Council said that the best approach was to make the case with Trump and his team privately so that these politicians can harm it by the main voters at the expense of higher prices and losses.

“It will be a velvet glove that lobbying it more thought out for politics, and it clearly includes Scott,” said another head of the US Council, citing US Treasury Minister Cattle.

According to the people who heard the comments, Disney Executive Director Bob expressed concern about the internal editorial meeting at ABC News.

He said that it would be not easy US companies Move your production to the country from specialized labor and various skills sets across borders. Igeer cited the example of Foxconn Apple facilities in China, where the technological giant makes the vast majority of their devices.

Iger also warned that Disney himself would be affected. According to him, the prices for steel prices are likely to rise the cost of the company for the construction of cruise ships, he said.

Trump tariff and Retaliation Commodity markets, resulting in raw prices settled on Friday at a three -year minimum of $ 65.58, and oil traders make the US administration not a direct plan to cancel punitive trade measures.

On Friday a shale tycoon Harold HamExecutive Chairman Continental Resources, said the Financial Times that it supports Trump and his efforts to carry out major reforms and restore the production of the United States by combating unfair trade practice abroad.

“But it is also true that you cannot drill, infant, drill when you produce oil and gas below the cost of delivery. Barnut manufacturers hope that the current market turbulence is a temporary situation so that they can provide the presidential agenda to resolve US energy dominance,” said Ham, which is also a screeching chairman.

The head of private capital in one of Galina’s largest firms said that many companies analyzed and allocated tariffs to see their influence on their lower lines and make decisions that would be ready for the “Liberation Day” when tariffs were announced.

But this previous work was thrown out because the White House formula used to calculate the tariffs has never come near people.

The peculiarities of investment firms have or plan to outline their views on tariffs, many of which are foreign investors who have been shocked and fees.

On Monday, Carly Group will host a “Special Global Investment Update” with leading investors, which is expected to co -founded David Rubenstein and two more executives outline the book to combat tariffs.

Some corporate leaders turned to peace and did not reduce the capacity that the market has overcome.

“Although it was pretty harsh and sharply, we all know that stocks tend to implement and underestimation,” said Herman Bulz, Deputy Chairman of the Jll Real Estate Group and Director of the Council in USAA, Host Hotels, Flunce Energy and Comfort Systems.

“This is not a surprise in the direction,” Bulls said. “This was said during the campaign and when it won.”

The tariff announcement took place at the middle of the “retailer” conference, which in New York took place Jpmorgan Chase for executives, investors and analysts in the retail sector.

Home Depot Chief Financial Director Richard McFeilla was among the executives who have already noted that there would now be potentially strenuous negotiations on tariff loading to suppliers rather than US consumers.

“In the usual course we always talk about costs with suppliers,” he said. “When it comes to tariffs, this is just another cost in the equation that we must understand.”

Another retail trade, guess this week suggested that it could move from suppliers in Asia to Latin America, where tariffs have usually announced more moderate.

But corporate advisers have stated that there are too many questions about US policy so that companies could make large -scale adjustments.

“I think they stop when they do not stop the main steps of supply because it is not even the beginning of the end,” said Christine Bol, a customs specialist in PWC US.

“This is not even the end of the beginning. There is too much uncertainty for the CEO to decide that he or she is going to pick up operations around the country and transfer them to B.’s country”

Report by Joshua Franklin, Stephen Foley, Anna Nikolaau, Antoine Mountain, Jamie Smith, Patrick Temple West and Claire Bush