Five takeaways from Canada party leaders’ big TV debate

Leaders from four major federal political parties in Canada squared in the second and final discussions ahead of the general election this month, but US President Donald Trump stole many attention on the stage.

The big question of the discussion was whether the liberal leader Mark Carney, led by the poll, was overwhelmed.

Carney, the president of the British bank, survived on Wednesday’s French debate.

On Thursday, he, his three opponents, Pierre Poil Ievre, new Democratic leaders, Jagmeet Singh and Bloc Québécois leaders, Eve Franco As Blancois Blanchet) was repeatedly found in place.

The subject was to respond to the ongoing trade war between Canada and the United States, but this discussion featured a fierce discussion about other problems facing Canada, such as cheap, crime and environment.

Here are five big takeouts in Thursday’s confrontation.

Carney’s opponents quickly polished their mistakes by his unparalleled Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

Conservative leader PoilIvre has referred to the “lost 10 years of lost liberalism” for the past decade when the Liberal Party has exercised its power. He quoted problems such as the high living expenses necessary to drive his housing economy and his branch home.

“How can we believe that you are different?” POILIEVRE asked Carney.

Blanchet also threw Gauntlets to Carney. “You claim that you are different -you must prove that you are getting better.”

Kani had to defend him many times, pointing out that he had been in the prime minister’s chairman for a month despite sharing a party banner like Trudeau.

Carney said, “I’m very different from Justin Trudeau.

Leaders negotiated with Trump and asked how they would respond to Canada’s tariffs.

Trump has a Blanket 25% tariff on Canadian products and is exempted from the product dealt with by USMCA, a North American free trade transaction. Canada also faces the world’s US tariffs on steel and aluminum and cars.

The president also publicly talked about Canada’s 51st US state.

The Canadian government said it would be a “dollar” tariff, with the goal of the previous maximum pain in the US economy.

But during the debate, leaders seemed to claim that it was not ultimately equal fight.

Carney said, “We moved from the tariffs of the Dollar.

Liberal leaders said that the focus will maximize the pain of the United States and turn into a tariff designed to make it possible to harm Canada as much as possible.

Trump seems to have softened his language in Canada in recent weeks. Kani said in late March that Trump respected the sovereignty of Canada. Their conversation was “constructive.”

Canada and the United States are expected to start a conversation on trade and security after the April 28 election.

Canadians have provided practical policy discussions on the subject, from home to crime and immigration, if they adjust the issues faced by the state beyond Trump and his tariffs.

It was clear that Canadians had a completely different choice in front of them.

PoilIvre often defended the vision of a small government that can maintain low taxes in order to increase the economic growth and economy of Canadians, which will be difficult for crime.

Meanwhile, Singh has promoted strong social programs in Canada, including Canada’s national dental treatment, pharmacist programs, and strengthening health care spending.

Kani was closer to his party’s point of view.

“The government can play a role, but its role should be a catalyst,” he said in the discussion about the strong leadership of the crisis.

Blancchet, the leader of the block, has advocated to defend Quebec’s unique places and protect its unique identity in Canada.

“I don’t want to be a Canadian leader,” he pointed out. The party supports Quebec’s final separation in Canada and does not occupy outside the province. But if it takes a lot of positions, it can be a powerful voting block in Congress.

Similar to the British political system, Canadian political systems feature several political parties, including mid -party, right -wing conservatives, left -wing Democrats, and blocks in Quebec. There is also a green party disqualified from the discussion about not running enough candidates at the last minute.

This means that Canadians make a clear choice when they head to the polling place.

But according to a poll, most Canadians choose to support the Conservative Party or the Liberal Party.

As a result, the third place party is fighting for survival. The national polls are 8.5%of Sing’s new Democratic polls, which can be converted from 24 seats to 5 out of 343.

Singh noticeably listened to his voice and tried to differentiate his party with a choice for left -wing voters by interfering with PoilIvre and Carney several times.

“You can’t take all the power to Carney,” Sing said.

On the other hand, the block leader inserts a problem related to fats that use French on all opportunities.

His party also found that he lost at least 12 seats in Quebec, and many people chose a vote for the Liberal Party because they believed that the party was better to deal with Trump and his threat.

There was an interruption, mental discussion, and even sometimes attack lines. But overall, the tone of the four federal leaders was somewhat warm.

As leaders discussed the housing crisis, efforts to measure dialogue were clear at some point. In rebuttal with poilIvre, Carney seemed to block himself before he was lying on his opponent.

Kani stopped the middle sentence for a while and said, “I misunderstand.”

Even after the enthusiasm, Carney and PoilIvre shook hands and later exchanged several laughter.

Overall, it was surprisingly different from those who had recently seen the presidential discussion cycle in the United States.

It was more friendly than the Federal Discussion of the past, which was characterized by other liberal and conservative candidates.