Apple’s shareholder offer to stop Dei in the company does not pass after voting

Diversity, justice and inclusion (Dei) Initiatives will continue at Apple after a bad voting of shareholders to NIX relevant programs.

On Tuesday, shareholders loudly rejected the attempt to overcome Dei’s initiative on Tech Behemoth.

During the meeting, Stefan Publing, Executive Director of the National Center for Free State Policy Research (FEP) said that Dei “regularly discriminates on the basis of race, sex and other demographic categories”, calling the “illegal” programs “

“The mood change is obvious. Dei is out. America is in,” he said, citing the recent executive order of President Donald Trump on diversity programs.

DEI reaction: Apple shareholders are preparing to vote under “radical” programs, contribution to “guerrilla” groups

Apple’s vote for analysis and assessment of “charitable gifts” for progressive groups has also not passed.

Last week, the Apple Council asked for shareholders to vote “NO” to the proposals criticizing the company’s contribution to progressive groups and calling on the technology corporation to stop its implementation of Dei.

Fox News Digital previously analyzed “Notification of the annual meeting of the 2025 shareholders” The selection of two proposals from Apple shareholders would bring significant changes to the company.

The proposal to cancel Dei in Apple failed to pass on Tuesday after the shareholders voting. (Getty Images / Istock / Getty Images)

The proposal 6, originally proposed by the National Center for State Policy Studies, suggested that these practices create “obvious risks” and that the release of the “Justice” campaign from the names “meaningless”, since it still expresses several obvious obligations “own capital.”

The shareholder also claimed that Apple’s policy fits “if no more radical than” most corporate Dei programs.

Offer emphasized alphabet, meta, microsoft and zoom, just a few companies having DEI’s efforts were rolled. In shareholders, these programs create “lawsuits, reputational and financial risks”.

The National State Policy and Research Center has pushed a similar measure last month during Annual Costco meeting. The proposal has been rejected.

Meanwhile, proposal 7, introduced by Wayne Franzer, which inspires the Investing LLC, criticized Apple’s contribution to progressive organizations.

Pepsi throws the main dei, the purpose of the submission – but not all convinced

On Wednesday, May 15, 2024, on Wednesday, May 15, 2024, in the shop of the fifth Avenue in New York, USA, New York, USA. (Michael Nagl / Bloomberg via Getty Images / Getty Images)

“Shareholders are asked annually to report Apple Inc. for reasonable costs and excluding confidential information, analysis of how Apple Inc. 2025 is the annual shareholder meeting.

The proposal, in part, criticized Apple’s contribution to the Center for Southern Poverty (SPLC), which, according to shareholders, uses its “hatred” and “hatred” to focus on political and religious groups, as well as individuals. Some critics are specifically aimed at moms for freedom, family studies, Dr. Ben Carson and more.

A shareholder noted that many companies, including John Dir, Jack Daniel, Harley-Davidson, Lowz, Homemade Depot, Ford and Molson Coars have already reoriented charity cottages to present the “various views” held by their customers and employees.

The head of Meta -Politics says the decision to stop Dei guarantees the work of the “most talented people” campaign

President Donald Trump (L) and Apple CEO Tim Cook Taked on FlexTronics Computer Production, where Mac Apple’s advantages will be collected on November 20, 2019. (Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images))

Edition 2024. Variety ViewPoint assessment The business has shown that 62% of the gained companies, including Apple, support non -profit organizations that affect public policy, actively attacking freedom of speech and religious freedom.

Apple’s Board recommends that shareholders vote “No” at the proposal of 6 and 7 during the annual shareholder meeting on February 25. In it, by the way.

Click here to read more about Fox Business

The Board also called two sentences “unnecessary” and inappropriate attempts to limit Apple’s usual business operations.