Halef’s roller, FT editor chooses his favorite stories in this weekly newsletter.
Alyaksandr said she approved plans this year when the airport agreed “to” a number of control over the work of this scheme “.
These include higher targets for public transport access to the site and quickly implement the noise mitigation scheme, officials say.
In the Planning Report on Thursday recommended refusal GatwickThe original application, but is unusually said that it will approve the application if the changes are made.
Alexander gave Gatwick the term of April 24 to reconsider his plans.
In a written statement, the ministry, Alexander, stated that she had made a “mind to approve a letter” for the second runway.
However, she said she needed an “extra time” to look for views from the relevant parties and extended the term for the final decision by nine months to October 27.
Gatwick did not immediately respond to a request for a comment proposed by the government by the $ 2.2 billion plan.
The project will greatly expand the power by moving an emergency landing in the second use of the airport in Britain by 12 meters north. The relocation would put a sufficient place between the lane and the existing runway so that both can work at the same time.

The project could see the planes flying from the second runway by the end of the current parliament in 2029.
One of the government officials said the decision was a “important step forward”, which demonstrated how the government “stopped anything” to ensure economic growth.
“Expanding will be of great benefit to business and is a victory for vacationers,” they said. “We want to provide this opportunity in accordance with our legal, environmental and climatic commitments.”
Gatwick, approximately 30 miles south of the Central London, said that the second staff runway would allow it to cope with 75 million passengers a year by the end of the 2030s, and above 46.5 million travelers who used airports in 2019.
The planning inspection demanded that Gatwick accepted a legally mandatory goal of at least 54 percent of passengers to come to the airport by public transport annually. Earlier, Gatwick claimed that he did not want the goal to be legally, and both sides would now seek a compromise.
The planning inspection also asked the gutch to change its original noise mitigation plan.
The gatwick submitted his expansion plan as a relatively low risk to add a new runway to the airport in London-in comparison with the long delay and politically controversial proposal to add AA Third Up -Passover Strip in Heathrons – As most work will be held within the existing limits. But local companies said they would challenge any decision in favor of the new runway in Gatwick in the courts.
Last month, Chancellor Rachel Rivz said the flights could leave the third runway in hires “For a decade”. She said the expansion of the hits “will unlock further growth, increase investments, increase exports and make Britain more open and more related.”
The Office of the Unified British Airport was obliged to make detailed proposals before this summer. But some labor deputies remain skeptical of the expansion of the hires, and the planning permit is unlikely to be granted to the nearest parliament in 2029.

In the coming weeks, Alexander must manage the Luton Airport in North London.
Whitehall representatives have said it seeks to approve the extension of the Luton – which does not include a new runway, but provides for the construction of new infrastructure and terminal power and taxi – as long as it can be resolved by noise over the Chiltern hills.
Stanted London Airports and Cities have approved their own expansion plans.
In total, expanded airports can process 309 million passengers annually – by an 85 percent increase by 167 million, which used them in 2023, in the last year for which full data is available, according to the Financial Times analysis.
Last month, Reivz said the airport expansion was compatible with the legally mandatory pure purpose of Zero 2050, pointing to a “more green flight” through the so -called persistent aviation fuels.
But climate groups claim that such an increase in the number of passengers will be incompatible for the purpose of 2050, taking into account the complexity in the decarbonization of aviation.
This story has been updated to clarify that the Transport Minister Heidi Alexander gave himself to October to make a final decision.
https://www.ft.com/__origami/service/image/v2/images/raw/https%3A%2F%2Fd1e00ek4ebabms.cloudfront.net%2Fproduction%2F158dfe64-86a9-4b80-aafd-331790275adf.jpg?source=next-article&fit=scale-down&quality=highest&width=700&dpr=1
2025-02-27 10:29:00