Welcome back. Two weeks ago I outlined Five optimistic scripts for the global economy. The first was “Donald Trump diluted his tariff plans.” Now that the US president has submitted its historical package, I am returning to this idea. This week I was looking for an argument why the US tariff rates would not remain high. That’s what I found.
First, economic pain. In the near future, most forecasters expect Trump import duties to raise prices and slow economic activities. But the White House may have overestimated its ability to withstand political pressure when tariffs entered.
Consumer feelings fall in anticipation of bad times forward. But since the last tariffs actually fall into the supply chains, it will fall.
Durable goods and non -solid items such as food and clothing are 30 percent of the US household costs. They will, to varying degrees, will suffer from higher duties. (One assessment suggests the cost of the iPhone 16 Pro Max can go from 1599 to 2300 if all tariff costs are transferred to consumers.)
Trump tariffs before April have already pushed the prices of the manufacturers. Given the degree and scale of its last blitz, inflation may increase and rather What was expected. Tariffs with blankets limit US suppliers’ ability to quickly find cheaper alternatives. Overall, Allianz Research hopes that about two -thirds of companies will be costs to consumers.
Non -Trump’s non -relevant consequences are also collected: the so -called government -related department, the disconnections related to had more than 280,000 Over the past two months, while existing tariffs and uncertainty hold back plans to hire and invest.
This relies on economic problems before Trump came. Reminder: Prices have risen by 20 percent on average from early January 2021 (with the cheapest goods that face even greater inflation), and debt in the republican states (which can be aggravated if the US Federal Reserve contains rates to longer to avoid tariff spirals). Overall the threshold of Americans for a quick, further pain is lower than the president thinks.
The target approach of the trading partners accepts the retribution, it will aggravate. For example, the EU comes up with levies aimed at the Republican States, including soybrows in Louisiana, Beef in Kansas and products in Alabama-in the response to steel and aluminum tariffs of Trump.
This matters because the approval ratings closely monitor consumer moods, especially for Republicans when Trump is in power. And political problems increased within the framework of the GOP before the “mutual” tariffs of the president.
Data collected from yougov by John Bern-Murdo in ft Shows Trump’s economic approval among his non -voters in 2024, which are rapidly falling. Wider republican consumer sentiments are now also in a turning point.
As Trump presented his latest tariffs, dissatisfaction has spread. On Wednesday, the Senate on Wednesday was transferred to a great extent a symbolic ruling on the cancellation of the tariffs against Canada. Later in the week, Reported about FT A gap that arises between leading republicans in trade policy. GOP Senator Ted Cruz (usually an avid Trump supporter) also warned about the potential “bloody” for Republicans in the November 2026 intermediate elections.
Enterprises can also become more vocal, at least in private, Mark Papik, BCA Research Chief Strategist. “Existing US corporations – which operate more level Americans than some theoretical production renaissance – will face steep costs and lose business in foreign markets.”
The main major technological, banking and industrial actions are immersed. Apple has experienced its largest one -day evaluation history. Tech Bros and Big Business Setworks will pressure the administration’s contacts, and the stocks of high -ranking officials will suffer.
Small business owners, which operate almost half of the private sector workforce and are an important republican voter, also feel less optimistic. The plans to stop the “de -minimis” of the worldwide scale will be particularly painful for them.
The financial markets will need something spectacular to switch Trump, given its foolish about reducing stock prices so far.
“It’s a bit like asking the pyraton to extinguish the fire he started,” said Jonas Goldman, deputy chief economist at Capital Economics. “There is a degree of pain, whether in promotions or in other markets, it will push some rethinking. But this is further than most thoughts.”
Can bond markets force it to change the course? Now the profitability of the US Treasury falls, as investors still consider them safe assets. But in one tail risk scenario, fiscal recklessness (for example, the stimulus measures on the background of unreliable revenues from tariffs, savings or growth forecasts), the growth of the term (given the unpredictability of Trump) and higher expectations of the interest rate (if high prices become fixed) can summarize the allowance. “In this case, it is supposed to (Scott) of the Seat will have to try to convince Trump that his approach is not amenable,” Golderman said.
One way or another, the aggregate pressure from the households, business, markets and Republicans on Trump will intensify even faster, now the tariffs in full. Possible delays, exceptions and cuts.
Can the administration mitigate the blow by speeding up tax reduction? Garret Watson, a policy director in the tax fund, is skeptical. He said he plans to extend existing Tax reducing cannot be considered a household income. Also, they do not cancel income from tariffs.
Watson added that the administration’s plans extra Taxes can help. But $ 2.9tn Trump’s tariffs will not even compensate for tax reducing. (In addition, tariff revenue is difficult to predict.) “The terms are also complex, negative consequences of the tariffs now, while the tax package will take even more time to pass and even more time to see the benefits of the lower line.”
Even assuming that the president can get rid of political pressure, there are other ways as tariffs may decline.
Intermediate deficiencies can lead to some limited tariff contractions. “Any price spikes from tariff hiking in totemic subjects can cause emergency steps to reduce prices, which quickly it always provides for the opening of imports,” said Simon Enette, Professor IMD, who notes that the administration, in irony, tries to fight the current lack of eggs. through trade.
Next, a partial rollback can be plausible if trading partners offer him sufficient concessions. Indeed, Trump has already demonstrated readiness to negotiate. By the end of this year, there are several bilateral Allianz Research transactions to reduce the effective tariff rate in the United States by about 40 percent.
Then there is a big picture. Trump hopes foreign investors will create factories in America to avoid tariffs. Given the time and expenses, rapid work and investment affiliation that compensates for internal economic pain is unlikely. Global manufacturers do not know how long tariffs will last, do not like uncertainty and need reliable supplies (domestic or international).
But the transition to America, which becomes a self -sufficient production center, is more expensive, more protracted and less desirable process than Trump believes that. The global trade industry is more interrelated and complex than in the late 19th century, when the US had high tariffs over a wide period. Today’s cost of staying behind the protectionist wall is much higher (see. Bulletin last week).
The owners of international factories know this. Most can decide on this, which can increase the pressure on Trump. It also means that the production of the United States is unlikely to grow until the moment when the tariff decrease in the future is more difficult, as installed, personnel industries are usually lobbying to keep them.
Of course, in the near future the logs can even increase. But there is perhaps a greater likelihood between the rapidly increasing economic pain, political pressure and commitment to the talks that the tariffs will leave earlier than they were afraid.
“He will certainly pay a political price if there is nothing to show at the end of this chaos. And this is a real opportunity,” said Morris Obstfeld, a senior employee of the International Economy Institute Peterson.
Indeed, even if Trump does not batch on pressure in his term, it is difficult to understand how any next administration can justify the preservation of his leisure.
How do you think the Trump tariffs will last? Send your thoughts Freeelunch@ft.com either on x @tejparikh90.
Food for reflections
After remaining permanent for three decades, the US restaurants have grown during the pandemic and remained high. Why? New NERB work paper It believes that the lifting of the departure culture with the help of food delivery is a secret sauce.
https://www.ft.com/__origami/service/image/v2/images/raw/https%3A%2F%2Fd1e00ek4ebabms.cloudfront.net%2Fproduction%2Fda8c12fb-8c83-48c0-ae1b-aae6992ffaee.jpg?source=next-article&fit=scale-down&quality=highest&width=700&dpr=1
2025-04-06 11:00:00