The legal definition of a woman refers to the “biological sex”, the UK’s rules

Unlock Digest Editor free

Halef’s roller, FT editor chooses his favorite stories in this weekly newsletter.

The highest court of the UK ruled that the definition of “woman” in the legislation of equality refers to the one who is born biologically female, as a result of the blow for human rights defenders for the rights of transgenders.

A Supreme It was found in the unanimous decision that the meaning of the “woman” in the law on anti-discrimination does not apply to the trans-female with a certificate as recognized by gender recognition.

A attentive decision on Wednesday was made by groups that campaign for the championship based on sex, but caused concern that protection for transgender could be blown.

“Terms of” Woman “and” Sex “in the Law on Equality of 2010 are a biological woman and biological sex,” said Lord Patrick Hodge, deputy president of the Supreme Court.

However, he added: “We advise against reading this decision as a triumph of one or more groups in our society at the expense of another. This is not.”

He said that the law on equality had a different defense for transgenders, including against discrimination and persecution.

The UK government said the ruling “brings clarity and confidence for women and service providers such as hospitals, shelters and sports clubs.” It adds that “single sexual space is protected by law and will always be protected by this government.”

The ruling of the Supreme Court, which has jurisdiction throughout the UK, follows from a protracted legal battle in Scotland.

The Female Scotland campaign (FWS) has challenged the Scottish Government on the occasion of a bill adopted in 2018, aimed at increasing the representation of women on the councils of state bodies.

FWS initially managed to challenge the law that included the woman’s woman in the definition of women. In 2022, the court in Edinburgh ruled that the case had been overwhelming the legal powers of the Scottish Parliament.

However, in response to this ruling, the Scottish government changed its approach to issuing revised statutory recommendations, saying that the importance of a woman in accordance with the 2010 equality law extended to a person with a gender certificate.

FWS challenged this leadership on the grounds that gender, in accordance with the law on equality, referred to its biological meaning, and the Scottish government crossed its powers, essentially rethinking the meaning of “women”.

Scottish courts rejected the FWS call, but the right went to the UK Supreme Court, which ruled on the matter on Wednesday.

Chelsea Feeney, an employee of the employment of the law firm Stevens & Bolton, said that many disputes would be mentioned.

Employers may need to revise human resources policy to make sure they are in line with the updated definition of a woman, she said.

Politics related to same -sex spaces may exclude transgender people with certificates for recognition of gender areas that do not match their biological sex, she added.

“However, the employers should note that the equality law is still providing transgenders from discrimination through a protected characterization of their gender renovation,” the finish said.

Elizabeth McGloon, head of the partner in Didlaw, called the consequences as “huge”.

“Employers now have to consider their” inclusion “policy towards” women’s “objects and make sure that they understand this woman, for the purpose of the law on equality, means” biological woman, “she said.

Scottish greenery called the sentence as “deeply concerned with human rights” and “a huge blow for some of the most marginalized people in our society.”

“It can remove important protection and leave a lot of trans -people and their loved ones deeply concerned,” said Maggie Chapman SME.